Proposed rules would require nutrition info on alcohol labels apnews.com 10 points by geox 7 hours ago
BugsJustFindMe 7 hours ago > Similar rules were first proposed nearly two decades agoWhat a farcical state we live in. What possible non-malign reason is there to not require it? Why was this not done nearly two decades ago?
metalman 20 minutes ago Stout wins! It is already classified as food in Ireland, whisky bieng of course, a much more serious endevour.
dcrazy 6 hours ago It shocked me to learn that alcohol content wasn’t already a required element of alcoholic product labels. Even knowing that alcohol is outside the purview of the FDA, it seems it would at least be relevant for taxation!
> Similar rules were first proposed nearly two decades ago
What a farcical state we live in. What possible non-malign reason is there to not require it? Why was this not done nearly two decades ago?
Stout wins! It is already classified as food in Ireland, whisky bieng of course, a much more serious endevour.
It shocked me to learn that alcohol content wasn’t already a required element of alcoholic product labels. Even knowing that alcohol is outside the purview of the FDA, it seems it would at least be relevant for taxation!