jart 16 hours ago

Let me guess, next year they become mandatory.

Next thing you know, they'll find a way to require that your web server link their dynamic shared object.

Then another year later you'll need a let's encrypt kernel module too.

  • nadermx 14 hours ago

    If you're so against free SSl's with an option for shorter half life you could use a paid alternative? Not sure I understand your grip with a free service

    • dambi0 7 hours ago

      By half-life do you mean the point at which you decide to renew the certificate prior to its actual expiry? Couldn’t you as a matter of policy decide to do this at, say 45 days, even with a cert that lasts for a year? If so, then the change to 99 day expiry isn’t giving you any more options or flexibility, it’s actually removing it.

    • sentientslug 14 hours ago

      Free services are not immune to valid criticism, although I do think they are going a bit too far.

      • bravetraveler 13 hours ago

        +1

        "We really want to make sure you have automation, so certificate lifetimes have been reduced to 36 seconds; accounting for RTT and, in our generosity, time for a single timeout/retry" /s

        Let it be my problem, please. I'll even use certbot or whatever is in fashion, just find another knob to turn [or don't].

  • nickf 7 hours ago

    Probably 47 days mandatory maximum, hopefully by 2029.

snailmailman 14 hours ago

90 days has always seemed unnecessarily long to me. I have definitely spun up short-lived pages on subdomains that end up getting a cert that outlives the site itself.

I am concerned at how the cert transparency logs will handle this. That’s going to be a lot of certs getting logged globally if everyone switches to shorter lifetimes.