Graziano_M 17 hours ago

No way, a measure of fat around your midsection is a better predictor than height and weight, not accounting at all for composition?

  • andreareina 2 hours ago

    This is a meme that fails to understand the actual, in practice limitations of BMI. The problem is that it underdiagnoses obesity, not that it overdiagnoses it. The problem isn't the nonexistent horde of lean muscular people with BMI > 25, it's all the clinically obese people with BMI < 30 thinking that yeah they're overweight but it's not that bad, they're not obese.

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2877506/#:~:text=BM...

  • snthpy 3 hours ago

    Idk. At one point I was at 11% body fat and still had BMI over 25. (83kg and 1.82m) I don't think I've ever been BMI < 25.

BobbyTables2 12 hours ago

I’ve gained about 15 lbs from my younger days and lost 2” from the waist. Stomach sticks out now, didn’t back then.

So - progress ?!?!

Almost seems saying “floor breaking when stepped on strongly correlated with arterial blockage.”

tekla 16 hours ago

If you're at the point where waist to height ratio vs BMI is something you debate about, you're already too fat

  • m463 16 hours ago

    the lancet article is hard to just read and says it is a better predictor.

    I imagine there are people who think they are ok, who are not, but I can't tell if it goes the other way.

BugsJustFindMe 17 hours ago

They should use skeletal length instead of height to account for spine curvature disorders.

  • _aavaa_ 16 hours ago

    They should account for the difference between the two to control for comorbidities.